Stiffness pathologies in discrete granular systems: bifurcation, neutral equilibrium, and instability in the presence of kinematic constraints

The paper develops the stiffness relationship between the movements and forces among a system of discrete interacting grains. The approach is similar to that used in structural analysis, but the stiffness matrix of granular material is inherently non-symmetric because of the geometrics of particle interactions and of the frictional behavior of the contacts. Internal geometric constraints are imposed by the particles' shapes, in particular, by the surface curvatures of the particles at their points of contact. Moreover, the stiffness relationship is incrementally non-linear, and even small assemblies require the analysis of multiple stiffness branches, with each branch region being a pointed convex cone in displacement-space. These aspects of the particle-level stiffness relationship gives rise to three types of micro-scale failure: neutral equilibrium, bifurcation and path instability, and instability of equilibrium. These three pathologies are defined in the context of four types of displacement constraints, which can be readily analyzed with certain generalized inverses. That is, instability and non-uniqueness are investigated in the presence of kinematic constraints. Bifurcation paths can be either stable or unstable, as determined with the Hill-Bazant-Petryk criterion. Examples of simple granular systems of three, sixteen, and sixty four disks are analyzed. With each system, multiple contacts were assumed to be at the friction limit. Even with these small systems, micro-scale failure is expressed in many different forms, with some systems having hundreds of micro-scale failure modes. The examples suggest that micro-scale failure is pervasive within granular materials, with particle arrangements being in a nearly continual state of instability

Note: The Earthquake that Will Move Sentencing Discretion Back to the Judiciary? Blakely v. Washington and Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota

This Note begins by briefly laying out the evolution of criminal sentencing over the past century. It then surveys judicial interpretation of defendants’ Constitutional rights as they relate to sentencing procedure, focusing on the Court’s recent invalidation of Washington state’s sentencing guidelines in Blakely v. Washington. The note will then examine possible reforms to Minnesota’s sentencing guidelines pursuant to the Court’s decision. It will conclude by advocating that, despite the recent spotlight on Kansas’s sentencing guidelines, Minnesota’s best response to Blakely is to return some sentencing discretion to the judiciary by implementing a system of voluntary guidelines